Consider releasing as separate modules

[tomek-he-him]

Here’s an interesting discussion I took part in: mattdesl/module-best-practices#2.

[stoeffel]

I'm totally 👍 on this. I think I discussed this with @hemanth some time ago.

[hemanth]

Yes, as it was with fp-dom and fp-js we need to restart that as well 😉

[guumaster]

Are the 1-liners a superset of fp-js repos?

[hemanth]

Well, kina. fp-js was made for all the supporting libs for fp-dom, later on 1-liners picked up, it's your choice if you want to do a fj-* module as well.

[guumaster]

It may be redundant to have an fp-* container. Having 1-liners with auto-curry options as discussed in #90 would be a better choice.

[stoeffel]

Having 1-liners with auto-curry options as discussed in #90 would be a better choice.

👍 We could also think about using 1-liners in fp-dom instead of fp-js.

[guumaster]

@stoeffel I've just tried that today, but the interfaces are not the same. So, I ended up here and found out about the differences between the projects.

It doesn't seem so hard to adpat all of fp-dom to 1-liners, but if the auto-curry option is not so far in the roadmap, i'd rather wait for it. Is that feature coming soon?

[stoeffel]

@guumaster I hope I can begin with the auto-curry feature soon. But if you are interested in starting it, contribution is always welcome.