You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This has become more relevant in light of the recent API conversations. It would be great if aztec circuits didn't have to rely on crypto/ecc/etc functions and types outside the stdlib.
Does the Composer / CircuitConstructor separation affect this at all?
@suyash67 looked into this previously and we determined that it was too hard (for the moment at least).
Please discuss and let's come to a conclusion whether this is feasible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Spike finished: the project was abandoned when it was decided that the core protocol circuits would be written in Noir. It could be picked up again though--in particular, it would be nice if the recursive verifiers were the only verifiers, but a simulator offered a fast execution mode.
This has become more relevant in light of the recent API conversations. It would be great if aztec circuits didn't have to rely on crypto/ecc/etc functions and types outside the stdlib.
Does the Composer / CircuitConstructor separation affect this at all?
@suyash67 looked into this previously and we determined that it was too hard (for the moment at least).
Please discuss and let's come to a conclusion whether this is feasible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: