Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider parallel or full switch of CI to VSTS #52

Open
Oceanswave opened this issue Jan 13, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Consider parallel or full switch of CI to VSTS #52

Oceanswave opened this issue Jan 13, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
ci/cd

Comments

@Oceanswave
Copy link
Member

VSTS now has Linux and macOS build agents in preview. Consider switching over to VSTS. And advantage will be that the Windows test harness can start auto-reporting code coverage again as the enterprise bits required to do so are on VSTS
@Oceanswave
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks to coverlet, code coverage is now auto-reported again, so this item becomes less pressing.

It would be nice, however, to have VSTS builds in addition to the existing appveyor/travisci for additional validation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ci/cd
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Oceanswave