Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion regarding EnergyPlus HTML results #10451

Open
3 tasks
Mouse-Diplodicus opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks

Suggestion regarding EnergyPlus HTML results #10451

Mouse-Diplodicus opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Mouse-Diplodicus
Copy link

Mouse-Diplodicus commented Mar 27, 2024

Issue overview

I have been looking into processing the HTML results generated by EnergyPlus (through OpenStudio if that is relevant) in Microsoft PowerBI. One issue I ran into is that when importing the data, PowerBI fails to pull the table name. Upon doing some research and testing it appears that PowerBI looks for the preceding header to name the tables.

Details

My suggestion is a minor change to the HTML generation (eplustbl.html), by replacing the bold tag around the titles for the tables with a header tag (it seems like any header tag works h1, h2, h3, etc.) PowerBI will be able to properly label the tables it imports.
image
I did some testing and found using the <h4> tag along with removing one of the preceding and the two following line breaks was a near-perfect match to the existing formatting:
image

Checklist

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Defect file added (list location of defect file here)
  • Ticket added to Pivotal for defect (development team task)
  • Pull request created (the pull request will have additional tasks related to reviewing changes that fix this defect)
@jmarrec
Copy link
Contributor

jmarrec commented May 27, 2024

Pretty much a duplicate of:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants