Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up duplicate categories in provider table #113

Open
markdav-is opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Clean up duplicate categories in provider table #113

markdav-is opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@markdav-is
Copy link
Member

providers that are mapped to two subcategories in the same category create duplicate categories in the provider table. I suspect this is because of relation going thru CatSubCat and not linking to the Category table directly.

image

This also manifests in JSON returned by the API.

image

@markdav-is markdav-is added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 21, 2020
@ArthurSmid
Copy link
Contributor

To support volunteers who are helping to verify the data, I made use of an Airtable feature that allows us to hide columns. In the screen shot of the base, you'll see it in the menu bar "Hide fields".

Help Services is the only table needed for volunteers doing data maintenance, and by hiding fields they don't need to update in that table, it's possible for them to navigate with less confusion. This makes it much easier for volunteers to read and understand and update the contents of Help Services.

For the web team, if you need to view any of the hidden fields, you can toggle any of them into view by clicking on the Hide fields button and selecting the fields you want to access.

And yet, this doesn't solve the issue, about the JSON having duplicate category ids.

@markdav-is
Copy link
Member Author

markdav-is commented Nov 13, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants