You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some users don't want/need to see inactive users in the "Owners" dropdown in list views and on Superset entities.
Proposed Change
Use the isActive attribute to hide any users that are inactive on the front end. We can put this behind a config flag since some users do want to see inactive users.
New or Changed Public Interfaces
Any instances of the "Owners" dropdown will only show active users.
This will be toggled with a config flag so that users have the option to show or hide inactive users.
New dependencies
None.
Migration Plan and Compatibility
No changes here.
Rejected Alternatives
I'm unaware of any rejected alternatives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What determines whether a user is active or inactive? Are there thresholds to be set as well?
Is it better to flag users as "inactive" rather than "isActive" assuming they're active by default, and may fall into some lapsed state? This may avoid having to run a migration to add "isActive" to all users.
[SIP-134] Proposal for Hide inactive users
Motivation
Some users don't want/need to see inactive users in the "Owners" dropdown in list views and on Superset entities.
Proposed Change
Use the
isActive
attribute to hide any users that are inactive on the front end. We can put this behind a config flag since some users do want to see inactive users.New or Changed Public Interfaces
New dependencies
None.
Migration Plan and Compatibility
No changes here.
Rejected Alternatives
I'm unaware of any rejected alternatives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: