noms-chat demos

[ghost]

https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19

where is the IPFS wrapper ?

The sample have had no commits for a while so i am guessing they are stale...
Wondering which is the best sample to use to try things out with.

[aboodman]

I took it out, here: 24dc7ad ... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that. What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it)

…

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19 where is the IPFS wrapper ? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3808>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi> .

[ghost]

My interest. I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park. Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw ! So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :)

…

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, ***@***.***> wrote: I took it out, here: 24dc7ad ... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that. What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it) On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: > https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ > decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19 > > where is the IPFS wrapper ? > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#3808>, or mute the thread > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi > > . > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3808 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi> .

[ghost]

Btw samples could be in a different repo and vendor all their dependencies. Will make it easier to hack on noms are not care about breaking samples

…

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 16:42 Ged Wed, ***@***.***> wrote: My interest. I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park. Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw ! So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :) On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, ***@***.***> wrote: > I took it out, here: > > > 24dc7ad > > ... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that. > > What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward > w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it) > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: > > > https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ > > decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19 > > > > where is the IPFS wrapper ? > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <#3808>, or mute the thread > > < > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi > > > > . > > > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#3808 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi> > . >

[aboodman]

Cool. You can just check out the code from before my change right now. I'll figure out whether to undo this change to remove the IPFS store or fix the demo soon. Thanks!

…

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:43 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: My interest. I am playing around with crdt, ipts. And mom's is definitely in the same ball park. Reason ? Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw ! So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :) On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, ***@***.***> wrote: > I took it out, here: > > > 24dc7ad f24d13f525 > > ... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that. > > What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward > w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it) > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: > > > https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ > > decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19 > > > > where is the IPFS wrapper ? > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <#3808>, or mute the thread > > < > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi > > > > . > > > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#3808 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi> > . > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3808 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BFP5N5J7YOA-kbo0mNy62EU1stDLks5t6TwFgaJpZM4UeYZi> .

[aboodman]

Yeah agree. I think someone else who was looking at this recently ran into a problem that direction... I think it was just how to make all the CLI tools know about the other chunkstore type. Like if IPFS store is in another repo that is fine for applications that directly link noms. But what about `noms show` and friends?

…

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:44 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: Btw samples could be in a different repo and vendor all their dependencies. Will make it easier to hack on noms are not care about breaking samples On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 16:42 Ged Wed, ***@***.***> wrote: > My interest. > > I am playing around with crdt, ipts. > And mom's is definitely in the same ball park. > > Reason ? > Offline clients and synchronisation back to server (s). > Working on NAT and using QUIC. QUIC just got added to IPFS btw ! > > So I am just looking for samples to get going fast to experiment :) > > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 15:24 Aaron Boodman, ***@***.***> wrote: > >> I took it out, here: >> >> >> https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/commit/ 24dc7ad >> >> ... and forgot to update the samples. Sorry about that. >> >> What's your interest in it? (I need to figure out whether to move forward >> w/ the refactor I started there, or undo it) >> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:12 AM, gedw99 ***@***.***> wrote: >> >> > https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/samples/go/ >> > decent/p2p-chat/main.go#L19 >> > >> > where is the IPFS wrapper ? >> > >> > — >> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. >> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> > <#3808>, or mute the thread >> > < >> https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAE6BMRmOd6d3UIx1iQhUk7JQI3fAy7Mks5t6SbBgaJpZM4UeYZi >> > >> > . >> > >> >> — >> You are receiving this because you authored the thread. >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> <#3808 (comment) >, >> or mute the thread >> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ ATuCwn8UYtlECFiFZnhrRaeiOnjTumHiks5t6Sl3gaJpZM4UeYZi> >> . >> > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3808 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAE6BC0RMTPPlnKMLi3ZD5RanWWSoSCMks5t6TxTgaJpZM4UeYZi> .

[aboodman]

I tried to revert 24dc7ad but I can't seem to remember how to get gx to pull all the deps, so I still can't build :-/.