Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

data exports for v1 explainer #122

Open
jhamman opened this issue Sep 28, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

data exports for v1 explainer #122

jhamman opened this issue Sep 28, 2021 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jhamman
Copy link

jhamman commented Sep 28, 2021

We had a very productive call today discussing the data needs for the v1 explainer. This issue documents the outputs of that call:

Figures 1 (global maps) a zarr group with a 2d "biomass" variable (coarsened to 0.5 deg) and 1d "lat" and "long" variables as coordinates (~700x1 and ~300x1)

Figure 5 (differences maps) a zarr group with a 3d "difference" variable (coarsened to 0.5 deg) with the three difference maps we want to show and 1d "lat" and "long" variables as coordinates (~700x1 and ~300x1)

GeoJSON for the "study domain"

R2 and other stats in a JSON

@tcchiao
Copy link
Contributor

tcchiao commented Sep 28, 2021

Update:

  1. Figure 1 data can be found in s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/map/half_degree_total_biomass.zarr or s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/map/half_degree_aboveground_biomass_only.zarr. With the difference being the sum of all forest carbon pools vs. aboveground biomass only. Since we talked about having the four carbon pools as a strength, I believe it makes sense to showcase the total biomass file, but am open to using the AGB one if that's useful comparison for Figure 5 or other datasets.
  2. GeoJSON of study domain is in s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/masks/study_domain.geojson.

Working on Figure 5 to swap out Spawn with GlobBiomass now.

@freeman-lab
Copy link
Member

great @tcchiao ! re: AGB vs all carbon pools, which are you using in the Figure 5 comparison? as in, which gets used to calculate the differences? if that's AGB only, then it might make sense to have both available in Fig 1 (with a toggle)

anyway, can get started with what you shared here

@tcchiao
Copy link
Contributor

tcchiao commented Sep 28, 2021

Figure 5 comparison is just AGB, making both available sounds great -- should I merge the 2 files then?

@freeman-lab
Copy link
Member

sure let's do that!

@freeman-lab
Copy link
Member

also @tcchiao just to flag, i had to go in manually and make this one public, no worries, but if you thought you had done that, we should definitely debug why it doesn't seem to work!

@tcchiao
Copy link
Contributor

tcchiao commented Sep 30, 2021

Update:

  1. Figure 1 data is in s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/map/v1/half_degree_biomass.zarr
  2. Figure 5 data is in s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/map/v1/half_degree_AGB_diff.zarr
  3. GeoJson (for figure 1) is in s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/masks/study_domain.geojson
  4. Error metrics in json format (for figure 5) is in s3://carbonplan-climatetrace/v1.2/map/v1/diff_metrics.json

@freeman-lab
Copy link
Member

@tcchiao looks like half_degree_biomass.zarr and half_degree_AGB_diff.zarr have blosc compression on the biomass and variable variables whereas x and y are zlib, needs to be zlib on all, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants