Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rawgit shutting down; update links #749

Open
abhishalya opened this issue Aug 25, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

rawgit shutting down; update links #749

abhishalya opened this issue Aug 25, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@abhishalya
Copy link
Member

abhishalya commented Aug 25, 2019

rawgit is shutting down and bears are throwing errors like these.

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member

jayvdb commented Aug 25, 2019

If the links can be easily replaced with an alternative, that would be great.

Otherwise an ignore entry in .coafile is needed now, and coala/coala-bears#2952 is an idea for how we could provide a way to allow broken links to be shown as broken links.

@abhishalya
Copy link
Member Author

abhishalya commented Aug 25, 2019

@abhishalya
Copy link
Member Author

Can't we directly use links from github like https://github.com/saksham189/GSoC-Report/raw/master/work.tar.gz or maybe https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coala/coalaCSS/master/coala.css?

Okay, well this explains that. But I don't think it affects us too much. But, still if we need something like rawgit, we could use https://raw.githack.com/ which seems to be the exact same thing.

@KVGarg
Copy link
Contributor

KVGarg commented Aug 30, 2019

we could use https://raw.githack.com/ which seems to be the exact same thing.

Yeah! We can use that too. Also there were some following free services suggested by rawgit on there website that offer fantastic alternatives to some or all of RawGit's functionality. You may like them even more than RawGit.

  • jsDelivr
  • GitHub Pages
  • CodeSandbox
  • unpkg

@moazfarrukh
Copy link

has this issue been resolved?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants