You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see that the tagline is "CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition". As far as I know, emotion is the least performant of all the styling options I've benchmarked, as the library regularly adds from 10-20% runtime overhead. That statement is misleading and should probably be switched to highlight a different feature of the project.
The Performance page in the docs has a similar issue, it doesn't seem to accurately reflect real-world observations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see that the tagline is "CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition". As far as I know, emotion is the least performant of all the styling options I've benchmarked, as the library regularly adds from 10-20% runtime overhead. That statement is misleading and should probably be switched to highlight a different feature of the project.
The Performance page in the docs has a similar issue, it doesn't seem to accurately reflect real-world observations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: