Your submission has been submitted.

[betatim]

Thank you everyone for your never ending enthusiasm! This was a real team effort. I can't quite believe that ten days ago this ideas was on hold and now it is a real proposal!

🏁 🎊 🎉 🎊 🚀 🎢

To all the commentators, writers, spellers, mergers, issue creators, issue resolvers, idea'ators: thank you. But keep coming back because this is just the start!

At the same time I'd like to point out our new home: https://github.com/everpub

ps. I think the amount of 📧 you will receive from this repo will reduce to a more sustainable level now 😀
pps. openscienceprize will announce their decision at the end of April

[ctb]

good work @betatim in wrangling!

[cranmer]

Congratulations everyone!

(currently not possible to join the organization)

On Feb 29, 2016, at 4:20 PM, Tim Head notifications@github.com wrote:

Thank you everyone for your never ending enthusiasm! This was a real team effort. I can't quite believe that ten days ago e0b7af5 this ideas was on hold and now it is a real proposal!

To all the commentators, writers, spellers, mergers, issue creators, issue resolvers, idea'ators: thank you. But keep coming back because this is just the start!

At the same time I'd like to point out our new home: https://github.com/everpub https://github.com/everpub
ps. I think the amount of you will receive from this repo will reduce to a more sustainable level now
pps. openscienceprize will announce their decision at the end of April

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #109.

[lukasheinrich]

🎉 that was fun.

[khinsen]

@betatim My conclusion is that you are a good team leader.

[rougier]

Many thanks for this exciting project.

[anaderi]

@betatim , all, thanks a lot for this and huge congrats ! Now what still remains is to make it happen ) maybe regardless the award? maybe we could organize ourselves in a kind of hackathon or so at some point? even remotely?
Anyway, I've learned a lot and still there are things to digest )

[JackDapid]

Great Tim. Congrats. Looking forward to the next steps - happy to help to bring this to the science hackathon we started to organise or help with a dedicated hackathon like @anaderi proposed - really looking forward to see this happen - with award or without

[betatim]

News regarding the prize:

---

Thank you for applying for the Open Science Prize, your application “Everpub: reusable research, 21st century style” has now been reviewed. The competition was very strong, and we are sorry to inform you that your application has not been successful. We apologise but due to the high volume of applications we received, we are unable to provide detailed feedback on individual applications.

We wish you all the very best in taking forward your idea, and hope you secure funding for your project from an alternative source.

Kind regards,
The Open Science Prize Team

---

😢 Thank you again everyone who helped with the proposal! Now we get to find out who really likes the idea and will continue working on building the ingredients needed to make something like everpub a reality.

[JackDapid]

Dear Tim and all,

heads up, these prizes are a hard business, always a lot of work and at the same application can be success with one prize and totally fail for another - I gave up to believe it is mostly logical.
The next one will work. Currently we work on the science hackathon I think I already mentioned here - we might have some resources to make some next steps for ever pub - but to early to say.

However I fully agree a great project, no reason to speed down ...

Cheers,

Daniel

On 23. Mar. 2016, at 13:06 , Tim Head notifications@github.com wrote:

News regarding the prize:

Thank you for applying for the Open Science Prize, your application “Everpub: reusable research, 21st century style” has now been reviewed. The competition was very strong, and we are sorry to inform you that your application has not been successful. We apologise but due to the high volume of applications we received, we are unable to provide detailed feedback on individual applications.

We wish you all the very best in taking forward your idea, and hope you secure funding for your project from an alternative source.

Kind regards,
The Open Science Prize Team

Thank you again everyone who helped with the proposal! Now we get to find out who really likes the idea and will continue working on building the ingredients needed to make something like everpub a reality.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[cranmer]

Definitely a crap shoot, but disappointing.
We will continue with the workflow related work for sure.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:40 AM JackDapid notifications@github.com wrote:

Dear Tim and all,

heads up, these prizes are a hard business, always a lot of work and at
the same application can be success with one prize and totally fail for
another - I gave up to believe it is mostly logical.
The next one will work. Currently we work on the science hackathon I think
I already mentioned here - we might have some resources to make some next
steps for ever pub - but to early to say.

However I fully agree a great project, no reason to speed down ...

Cheers,

Daniel

On 23. Mar. 2016, at 13:06 , Tim Head notifications@github.com wrote:

News regarding the prize:

Thank you for applying for the Open Science Prize, your application
“Everpub: reusable research, 21st century style” has now been reviewed. The
competition was very strong, and we are sorry to inform you that your
application has not been successful. We apologise but due to the high
volume of applications we received, we are unable to provide detailed
feedback on individual applications.

We wish you all the very best in taking forward your idea, and hope you
secure funding for your project from an alternative source.

Kind regards,
The Open Science Prize Team

Thank you again everyone who helped with the proposal! Now we get to
find out who really likes the idea and will continue working on building
the ingredients needed to make something like everpub a reality.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

—
You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#109 (comment)

[betatim]

Work on everware is speeding up at the moment which has a lot of overlap with this proposal and with @lukasheinrich and @cranmer continuing their work the world will still get something like everpub, just not as quickly or maybe more quickly? :)

[anaderi]

Those things are like buses, another one is always coming. BTW is anyone going to Egi open science conference in Amsterdam this April? https://indico.egi.eu/indico/event/2875/ Seems like a delegate place to pitch about everpub.

[ctb]

Bummer!

[khinsen]

Just saw this project: http://wholetale.org/

There's a lot of overlap with what we want(ed) to do with Everpub, and it's funded. Don't know how open the project will be to outside collaboration, but it's worth exploring.

[Repositorian]

Just piping in to say that some of us in Science Library Land have been tracking the various initiatives around the Research Paper of the Future and a list is being compiled at the Caltech Library's Author Carpentry guide at http://libguides.caltech.edu/content.php?pid=693152. We have committed to an Author Carpentry initiative as a supplement to Software/Data Carpentry curricula, to train our campus authors in the skills needed to publish/release the Research Paper of the Future (and even needed to be effective with the research paper of today!)

More info about Author Carpentry is available on a new GitHub Repo, as we transform our materials to a 'Carpentry' approach to instructional design. Work very much in progress: https://github.com/caltechlibrary/AuthorCarpentry

[khinsen]

That list is nice to have thanks! BTW, here is another potential entry, though it's more an announcement than something functional for now: https://nextjournal.com/

Author Carpentry sounds like a great initiative, but I expect that it will be a lot of work to run. Good luck!

[mathematicalmichael]

@khinsen nextjournal.com/, while closed, seems to have been polished the furthest in the last two years. Looks like an excellent (if closed) project. Seems to be a reasonable business model IMO.

thoughts on where this project and similar ones have come in the time elapsed?