Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommended Mime Type #222

Open
aaraney opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Recommended Mime Type #222

aaraney opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@aaraney
Copy link

aaraney commented Jul 19, 2022

After a small amount of digging, the only recommended mime type ive come across is to use application/octet-stream (see tweet chain) dating back to 2020. Is this still the recommend mime type or has there been movement to register an official mime type with OGC and IANA?

@bjornharrtell
Copy link
Member

Any updates on this @ogcscotts ?

@heidivanparys
Copy link

I'm also interested in an answer to this. @ogcscotts Would OGC register FlatGeobuf if/when it becomes a community standard?

@bjornharrtell
Copy link
Member

@ogcscotts I can't see that anything has happened after https://www.ogc.org/requests/public-comment-requested-justification-document-for-flatgeobuf-as-an-ogc-community-standard/ was closed. Are we again stuck in some slow grinding wheels process? :)

@ogcscotts
Copy link
Contributor

@bjornharrtell sorry for the radio silence. We actually will be getting the vote started for this effort this month. We had another Community Standard effort stuck that needed to be clarified before this one could start. That finished on Sunday. Expect 6 weeks for the vote to complete and then we can jump quickly to the next step.

@ogcscotts
Copy link
Contributor

@bjornharrtell the slow grinding process is unstuck and the vote to approve the work item is now underway. We had a huge queue of votes, but all should proceed on a decent timeline now.

@bjornharrtell
Copy link
Member

bjornharrtell commented Nov 1, 2023

@ogcscotts that's nice to read! Too bad it can be such a grinding process but I suppose in a way it's good - no sense in making standards for things that are not in for the long game but it does look like flatgeobuf will be sticking around (against all odds?) :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants