Reducer.reducer not descriptive enough

[Anemolo]

Currently to get the reducer name it's reducer.reducer , but It is not really descriptive and misleading to what is actually returns. I think it is better if it is something like reducer.name or reducer.nickname.

What are other people's feelings on this?

[luigiplr]

Hmmm I like it, while we cant use name due to the fact its not a writable attribute of a Function nickname should work just as well! 🚀