Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Think abt timing and hands-on process #39

Open
stephwright opened this issue Apr 21, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Think abt timing and hands-on process #39

stephwright opened this issue Apr 21, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@stephwright
Copy link
Contributor

stephwright commented Apr 21, 2017

Think about how to address the following feedback:

  • pre-work to understand concepts before jumping into hands-on workshop
  • instruction w/ more specific tasks w/ pre-built items so everyone is doing the same thing i.e. get a hyperlink on the webpage
  • could make a full day- 1/2 same as today's 1st half, if people want more opt to stay for afternoon
  • live coding the process rather than slides (sugg from @gallingerj)
  • demo before letting us try or use it
    would have liked table-sized groups after the break - hard to keep up from the back of the room
@stephwright stephwright changed the title Think about timing of workshop and modules Think abt timing and hands-on process Apr 21, 2017
@gallingerj
Copy link
Collaborator

In particular, I think doing a pull request together once would have been helpful (i.e. learners follow along). There were folks creating weird branches to pull from and other bizarre methods of trying to do the pull request. I addressed these from table to table but I think it was a common confusion.

Another instruction point would be to point out the repo name and folder structure to help folks navigate better, i.e. click on "friendly-github" to navigate to the repo homepage on the "mozillascience" account.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants