Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I hope there can be a lightweight version, just a storage bucket #26569

Open
renjiali opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

I hope there can be a lightweight version, just a storage bucket #26569

renjiali opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@renjiali
Copy link

In many cases, we don't need too many things, such as databases. We just need its storage bucket.

@renjiali renjiali added the bug Something isn't working label May 20, 2024
@encima encima added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels May 20, 2024
@encima
Copy link
Contributor

encima commented May 20, 2024

Hi there, thanks for opening.

Are the cases you are talking about for Supabase? Supabase itself a platform with each component pretty integrated into it. For example, Storage uses the database to store the object metadata and integrates with Auth to control access.

When you do not need to use some features, you are welcome to not use them (i.e. some people use a different Auth provider). In the self-hosted version, each component uses pretty minimal resources, but most are needed.

If you are talking about the repository size, we have a guide in our docs under the Advanced tab that only checks out the docker folder.

In those cases where you just need storage, have you considered using Minio?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants