You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
In some cases I find that the size of a child ring is very disproportionate to its relative amount of space.
For instance, I have a folder "Run16" of size 33.50 Gb (figure 1) and it has many sub-directories. One of them is called "vpd_slew" with a size of 23.88 Gb (figure 2). Even though this is 71% of the space (reported as 36%) it shows up as a tiny almost invisible sliver.
Let me know if I can provide more useful info. SpaceRadar is great, thanks for good work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
In some cases I find that the size of a child ring is very disproportionate to its relative amount of space.
For instance, I have a folder "Run16" of size 33.50 Gb (figure 1) and it has many sub-directories. One of them is called "vpd_slew" with a size of 23.88 Gb (figure 2). Even though this is 71% of the space (reported as 36%) it shows up as a tiny almost invisible sliver.
Let me know if I can provide more useful info. SpaceRadar is great, thanks for good work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: