-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
about the updated version of PyMAF-X #27
Comments
Hi Hongwen Thanks for letting me know. Considering the compatibility, I pre-processed the input image with my own implementation (crop parts w/ mediapipe) and used PyMAF-X's ckpt for inference. If I want to integrate the updated version, should I change the pre-processing steps (cropping, transformation), or just need to update the ckpt, from v1.0 to v1.1? |
It should be fine to use your own cropping implementation and simply feed the body/face/hand part images to PyMAF-X. As there are several modifications on the face-specify regression network of the updated PyMAF-X, the ckpt v1.1 is no longer compatible with the original one. It is recommended to replace all configuration and model definition files with their updated version. Other minor issues: |
Congrats to ECON! 馃帀馃帀
It is just a kind reminder that an updated version of PyMAF-X is now available for better face and hand mesh regression.
i) the updated PyMAF-X uses the same version of SMPL-X (v2020) as PIXIE;
ii) the face and hand inputs of PyMAF-X are simplified (no need to provide local transformation information);
iii) the face regression performance should be on-par with PIXIE, see Fig. 7 and Table 4 of the updated paper;
Please check the updated PyMAF-X for more details :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: