Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

broken link #1161

Closed
0x0OZ opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

broken link #1161

0x0OZ opened this issue Feb 3, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@0x0OZ
Copy link

0x0OZ commented Feb 3, 2023

on page smart contracts-vyper

Vyper also takes the view that multiple inheritance can make code too complicated to understand—a view tacitly admitted by the Solidity documentation, which gives an example of how multiple inheritance can be problematic.
the referenced link is broken 404: http://bit.ly/2Q6Azvo

@adityakode
Copy link

I have created a PR, the issue will be fixed as soon as the PR is merged

@aantonop
Copy link
Member

aantonop commented Feb 21, 2023 via email

@0x0OZ
Copy link
Author

0x0OZ commented Feb 25, 2023

Okay @aantonop, but if you think it is a reference in the book itself, it is not, it refers to the old docs of solidity before it was moved.
the old docs for the broken link: https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/blob/release/docs/contracts.rst
A reference to the new docs: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/contracts.html#multiple-inheritance-and-linearization

@adityakode
Copy link

@0x0OZ thanks! I have made the changes and made a PR #1166

@0x0OZ 0x0OZ closed this as completed Mar 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants