-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reviewing and updating Truffle-related references and code #955
Comments
@wbnns thanks for the initial push. I ran a similar command and found 51 files for "truffle" and 13 files for "ganache": https://gist.github.com/adrianmcli/97fd7388989aba80c8ec15de66ec4c45 I think this can be broken down into the following categories:
I think we can probably ignore the What does everyone think? Files BreakdownGanache
Truffle
|
Also @wbnns is there a new deadline that you can give us? |
This sounds great. Thanks so much! With regard to a deadline, it would be great to see what you all may be able to help us accomplish in the next 2-4 weeks, alongside your other commitments, if possible. |
@wbnns Got it. @nicholasjpaterno and I will coordinate to have this done in a few weeks! |
Thanks! Please let us know as any questions arise. |
@wbnns 3 PRs are now ready for review for the Ganache-specific references. Do note that I didn't run through the tutorial itself yet, I just corrected things that I know to be incorrect. I assume someone needs to do all that before publishing (i.e. actually read through the book and do the tutorials). Ganache
|
@wbnns It's my understanding that files in the I think it might be a good idea to ignore them for now as a couple of them are quite outdated and require a lot of work to update. I'd rather focus our limited energies on what's already in the book. Also, #961 is my review of the in-text references of "truffle" and is ready for review. Files reviewed:
|
@adrianmcli Thanks for the assistance! Merged #958, #959, #960 & #961. Just to confirm, are you all still in the process of reviewing Regarding
Understood. Let's defer to @aantonop on this. Also:
Yes, this is correct. |
@wbnns thanks for the merge
I'm waiting to see when #962 gets merged in. Since 0.6 brings quite a few significant changes to the code, I'd have to do the reivew/testing all over again if I did it now and the PR was subsequently merged. |
Just pointing out that I am no longer associated with Truffle, but I am happy to keep helping with the book. |
Ok, that would be great. I hope the move is for the best and that it connects you with a new and awesome opportunity. What do you currently have bandwidth for in terms of what we were discussing previously? |
@wbnns I think we should make a decision on @HAOYUatHZ's issue first: #962 (comment) |
Has anyone gone through the proposed tutorial changes to make sure everything works with all the recent updates? Or do you need a hand on that? |
@chanhosuh I want to do it after all the code has been upgraded to 0.6. (e.g. when #962 is merged). Not sure why it's not merged yet though? @HAOYUatHZ @wbnns what's the timeline on having everything converted to 0.6 so we can test things out and finalize this edition of the book? |
by the way, I noticed the truffle build artifacts are also being committed for several of the projects... is that on purpose? Not sure what benefit that provides, but possibly could be an issue since it contains a mapping of network IDs to contract addresses which wouldn't work for readers. It also leaks a bit of info about the user's local environment, but that can be stripped out harmlessly, I believe, if the build artifacts are needed. |
Hello. I think late summer / early fall might be the earliest, most realistic estimate. |
@chanhosuh agreed, those can definitely be gitignored. |
#962 is kind of ready. If anyone can review it will be the best! |
#962 is merged, sorry for the delay! |
Please see #1119 |
@adrianmcli @nicholasjpaterno
Thank you all for your offer of assistance with helping review and update Truffle-related references and code. As discussed via email, opening this issue so we can organize / coordinate together.
There are currently a significant number of references, as can be seen via
git grep 'truffle'
(here's a link to a gist with the output).A lot of the code itself that needs to be reviewed/updated is in code/truffle.
Was thinking depending on your availability, it would be nice if you all could review the in-chapter references and help update the code samples.
Please let me know.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: