Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Localization of any number of tags at high frequency #13

Open
AlexisTM opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature] Localization of any number of tags at high frequency #13

AlexisTM opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@AlexisTM
Copy link

Did you consider implementing a GPS like protocol for the DWM1000?

This requires:

  • Synchronizing the timestamps of all devices;
  • Each anchor send its position and current timestamp;
  • From the positions and timestamps received, the devices compute their position.

Pros:

  • Works with any number of tags are they are in "listening only" mode;
  • Adding an anchor do not require to change the configuration of each tag;
  • The tags are "stupid" and thus do not need more configuration than the band, power, ... and can join any network seamlessly.

Cons:

  • The timestamp synchronization must be precise;
  • The anchors must send their messages in a synchronous way.
@ppannuto
Copy link
Member

It's a neat concept, but we haven't really pursed this. The biggest challenge is the time synchronization part. At the speed of light, 1 ns of time offset is ~30cm of range error. The best we've been able to synchronize a network of anchors (using DecaWave alone) is a few ns for one-hop neighbors and 10s of ns for two hop neighbors (see Fig 3 of https://patpannuto.com/pubs/kempke16surepoint.pdf).

Using an external synchronization mechanism, or maybe even a novel RF synchronization protocol, could be a cool way to enable things here, but it's not immediately obvious how to realize sufficiently high fidelity RF synchronization.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants