You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
User story
As an SSR, I would like to be able to come back and create a new cherrypick from a box that has already been partially picked from, so that I can cope with cases where the Lighthouse labs send boxes before providing all the data for them.
Who are the primary contacts for this story
Rich C
Acceptance criteria
The sample creation functionality of the Sentinel pages is idempotent, meaning that if I scan a box barcode twice it will not duplicate anything, and it will create any positive samples (and their plates) in Sequencescape that have not previously been created.
The submission / batch creation functionality of the Sentinel pages is more selective - it does not retrieve all plates for a scanned box barcode, it knows which plates have just been created using the samples creation page and just includes them in the batch.
We discussed combining the two pages into one page - see 'additional information' below
Assumptions
We can assume that 'partial plates' will not be created i.e. Lighthouse labs will not provide data for some samples on a plate, and then in a later file provide data for some more samples on the same plate. So we should only ever be creating new samples and adding them to new plates, not existing plates.
Additional Information
This came out of a call with Rich C, Harry, Ben and Katy following the issue with the first Sentinel cherrypick on 03/08/2020.
We agreed that a good solution would be to combine the 2 pages into 1, as per the original mock up (attached below). This would tie together samples creation and cherrypicking, which would be less flexible but Rich said this was fine.
So they would scan several box barcodes, it would retrieve the plates from LabWhere with positive samples, create these in Sequencescape and then display them in a table. User could then deselect any plates they didn't want to batch up, and then hit another button to create the batch in Sequencescape.
It was implemented as 2 separate pages due to concerns about whether the sample creation would be fast enough if multiple box barcodes were scanned at once - we will need to test this. Rich said an acceptable time to wait would be 2 mins per box barcode, and that he thought they would scan a maximum of 10 boxes at once (80 plates in each). However, he said a limit of 5 box barcodes would be OK if necessary.
User story
As an SSR, I would like to be able to come back and create a new cherrypick from a box that has already been partially picked from, so that I can cope with cases where the Lighthouse labs send boxes before providing all the data for them.
Who are the primary contacts for this story
Rich C
Acceptance criteria
Assumptions
We can assume that 'partial plates' will not be created i.e. Lighthouse labs will not provide data for some samples on a plate, and then in a later file provide data for some more samples on the same plate. So we should only ever be creating new samples and adding them to new plates, not existing plates.
Additional Information
This came out of a call with Rich C, Harry, Ben and Katy following the issue with the first Sentinel cherrypick on 03/08/2020.
We agreed that a good solution would be to combine the 2 pages into 1, as per the original mock up (attached below). This would tie together samples creation and cherrypicking, which would be less flexible but Rich said this was fine.
So they would scan several box barcodes, it would retrieve the plates from LabWhere with positive samples, create these in Sequencescape and then display them in a table. User could then deselect any plates they didn't want to batch up, and then hit another button to create the batch in Sequencescape.
It was implemented as 2 separate pages due to concerns about whether the sample creation would be fast enough if multiple box barcodes were scanned at once - we will need to test this. Rich said an acceptable time to wait would be 2 mins per box barcode, and that he thought they would scan a maximum of 10 boxes at once (80 plates in each). However, he said a limit of 5 box barcodes would be OK if necessary.
Original mock up: 20200708_GPL-588_Sentinal_CP.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: