Inconsistency issue with single_cls functionality and dataset class count

[Le0v1n]

Search before asking

• I have searched the YOLOv5 issues and discussions and found no similar questions.

Question

I found a small issue related to single_cls that I'm not quite clear on the purpose of.

In train.py, there is the following statement:

names = {0: "item"} if single_cls and len(data_dict["names"]) != 1 else data_dict["names"]  # class names

This statement can be broken down into:

if single_cls and len(data_dict["names"]) != 1:  # The user has enabled --single_cls, but the dataset configuration file has more than one class
    names = {0: "item"}
else:  # The user has not enabled --single_cls or len(data_dict["names"]) == 1
    names = data_dict["names"]

Here, single_cls indicates that the task has only one class; data_dict["names"] are the names of different classes defined in the dataset configuration file; len(dict) is used to determine the number of keys in a dictionary.

I don't understand why len(data_dict["names"]) != 1 is used. In the current code, names = {0: "item" only happens in one case, which is when --single_cls is enabled and the dataset configuration file has multiple classes. Is this case too rare? Suppose the dataset used is MS COCO, which has 80 classes, then after enabling --single_cls, only one class remains. Will the model still train and inference normally in this case?

Also, I suggest adding a warning to avoid misuse by users:

if single_cls and len(data_dict["names"]) != 1:
    LOGGER.warning("WARNING ⚠️ Please check the dataset to ensure that when --single_cls is enabled, the number of classes in the dataset is 1.")

Additional

No response

[glenn-jocher]

@Le0v1n hello! Thanks for bringing this up. 🌟

The single_cls flag in YOLOv5 is indeed used to train the model assuming there is only one class across the entire dataset. The condition len(data_dict["names"]) != 1 checks if the dataset configuration incorrectly specifies more than one class despite the single_cls flag being set. This is to ensure that the model does not mistakenly train on multiple classes when it's supposed to focus on just one.

Your observation about adding a warning is insightful! It would help users realize a potential misconfiguration in their dataset, especially in cases where they might not be aware that their dataset should only contain one class when single_cls is enabled. Implementing a warning like the one you suggested could indeed prevent confusion and ensure proper model training behavior.

Feel free to contribute this as a feature request or even a pull request if you're up for it. Contributions like these help make YOLOv5 even better for everyone! 😊

Thanks for your input and support!

[Le0v1n]

@glenn-jocher Thank you very much for your reply, which has resolved my confusion. 🥰

Inspired by you, I am delighted to submit a PR to Ultralytics to help users become aware of potential misconfigurations in the dataset. 😊

[glenn-jocher]

@Le0v1n That's fantastic to hear! 😊 We're thrilled that your confusion was cleared up and even more excited about your willingness to contribute with a PR. Contributions like yours help improve the experience for everyone using YOLOv5. Looking forward to seeing your PR and thank you for being a proactive member of the community! 🌟