Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Air-To-Water Heat Pump with Heat Recovery #10379

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

Nigusse
Copy link
Contributor

@Nigusse Nigusse commented Jan 26, 2024

Pull request overview

  • This new feature adds capability to support heat recovery in air-to-water heat pumps

Pull Request Author

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@Nigusse Nigusse added the NewFeature Includes code to add a new feature to EnergyPlus label Jan 26, 2024
@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar added this to the EnergyPlus 24.2 IOFreeze milestone Feb 12, 2024
@EnergyArchmage
Copy link
Contributor

Here is rough feedback from TRANE...

"Could the setup be expanded to 4 pipe units without any control changes?

Maybe I am mis-interpreting the diagram is this a four-pipe unit (or) a 2-pipe unit with heat recovery?

Our definition of 2 pipe is it can only operate in only one mode (control to a particulate CHW or HW Setpoint). 4 pipes could control to both.

Also, Bob did mention that we do sell heat recovery on four-pipe units but usually it works when its cooling dominant and recovered heat will be to supplement the heating side. To our awareness, the second diagram is not in market yet.

We do agree Brent that we need extra modifier curves to support heat recovery operation, something like below :

I am using VRF example (AIrConditioner:VariableRefrigerantFlow object fields on heat recovery modifier)"

image

image

Sounds to me like the model could be setup to handle both 2 pipe or 4 pipe. If there are both of the heating and cooling companion coils for the AWHP, then its a 4 pipe (6 pipes with HR and considering both companions), if no companion heat pump, then it is 2 pipe (4 pipe with HR).

@Nigusse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nigusse commented Feb 22, 2024

@EnergyArchmage Thanks. Please take a look at my response below.

(1) It should be either 2-pipe or 4-pipe ASHP configurations with a heat recovery option. This implies the 2-pipe ASHP with heat recovery becomes a 4-pipe system, and the 4-pipe ASHP with heat recovery becomes a 6-pipe system, assuming the heat recovery generates either HW or CW at a time. The schematic in the initial NFP is just a simple display of the heat recovery concept. I am trying to create a schematic of the equipment and plant layout topology for a 6-pipe system in the EnergyPlus context. It is helpful to see if you have an actual equipment and plant layout configuration of such a system.

(2) It is possible to use different capacity modifier curves when the ASHP operates in heat recovery mode. I must add a new capacity modifier curve input field for cooling and heating modes.

(3) A question regarding the Heat Recovery Ambient Relief Modifier Curve. Is this curve also used to adjust the heat recovery mode capacity? If that is the case, I need to understand how these curves are normalized to implement them correctly.

@nrel-bot-2c
Copy link

@Nigusse @Myoldmopar it has been 28 days since this pull request was last updated.

@nrel-bot-3
Copy link

@Nigusse @Myoldmopar it has been 28 days since this pull request was last updated.

@Myoldmopar
Copy link
Member

Merging this design/NFP only PR. It accompanies #10455 (and #10544 )

@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar merged commit 329ed86 into develop Jun 5, 2024
@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar deleted the air_to_water_hp_with_heat_recovery branch June 5, 2024 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NewFeature Includes code to add a new feature to EnergyPlus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants