Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

blockchain: Add ReconsiderBlock() #2181

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kcalvinalvin
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds ReconsiderBlock() on blockchain that will clear up any block validation statuses and re-validate the block. If the block is part of a longer chain, then the chain will reorganize to that chain.

Depends on #2155

Some of the functions in difficulty.go are not dependent on any external
functions and they are needed to introduce testing code for the
invalidateblock and reconsiderblock methods that are to be added on in
later commits. Having the workmath package let's us reuse the code and
avoid dependency cycles.

The existing functions that were exported already (HashToBig,
CompactToBig, BigToCompact, CalcWork) are still kept in difficulty.go
to avoid breaking external code that depends on those exported
functions.
spendableOut and the functions related to it are is moved to package
testhelper and are exported.  This is done to make the code reusable
without introducing an import cycle when the testing code for
invalidateblock and reconsiderblock are added in follow up commits.
solveBlock is moved to testhelper and is exported.  This is done so that
the code can be reused without introducing import cycles.  The testing
code to be added in alter commits for invalidateblock and reconsider
block will use SolveBlock.
The variables are moved to testhelper so that they can be reused in the
blockchain package without introducing an import cycle.  The testing
code for invalidateblock and reconsiderblock that will be added in later
commits will be using these variables.
uniqueOpReturnScript is moved to testhelper and is exported so that the
code and be reused in package blockchain without introducing import
cycles.  The test code for invalidateblock and reconsiderblock that are
gonna be added in later commits uses the functions.
standardCoinbaseScript is moved to testhelper and is exported.  This
allows test code in package blockchain to reuse the code without
introducing an import cycle.  This code is used in the testing code
for invalidateblock and reconsiderblock that's added in the later
commits.
createCoinbaseTx's code is refactored out and placed in testhelper
package and is exported so that callers in package blockchain can reuse
the code without introducing import cycles.  The test code for
invalidateblock and reconsiderblock that'll be added in later commits
make use of this code.
createSpendTx is moved to testhelper so that the function can be used
for callers in package blockchain without introducing import cycles.
The test code for invalidateblock and reconsiderblock that are going to
be added in later commits make use of this code.
The block generating functions here allow for a test to create mock
blocks.  This is useful for testing invalidateblock and reconsiderblock
methods on blockchain that will be added in later commits.
InvalidateBlock() invalidates a given block and marks all its
descendents as invalid as well. The active chain tip changes if the
invalidated block is part of the best chain.
reorganizeChain() used to handle the following:
1: That the blocknodes being disconnected/connected indeed to connect
   properly without errors.
2: Perform the actual disconnect/connect of the blocknodes.

The functionality of 1, the validation that the disconnects/connects can
happen without errors are now refactored out into
verifyReorganizationValidity.

This is an effort made so that ReconsiderBlock() can call
verifyReorganizationValidity and set the block status of the
reconsidered chain and return nil even when an error returns as it's ok
to get an error when reconsidering an invalid branch.
ReconsiderBlock reconsiders the validity of the block for the passed
in blockhash. The behavior of the function mimics that of Bitcoin Core.

The invalid status of the block nodes are reset and if the chaintip that
is being reconsidered has more cumulative work, then we'll validate the
blocks and reorganize to it. If the cumulative work is lesser than the
current active chain tip, then nothing else will be done.
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8893534348

Details

  • 413 of 475 (86.95%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
  • 15 unchanged lines in 4 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 57.021%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
blockchain/fullblocktests/generate.go 41 42 97.62%
blockchain/internal/testhelper/common.go 105 113 92.92%
blockchain/chain.go 197 250 78.8%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
connmgr/connmanager.go 1 86.27%
btcec/schnorr/musig2/sign.go 2 90.44%
blockchain/chain.go 3 74.67%
peer/peer.go 9 73.94%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8881487645: 0.1%
Covered Lines: 29628
Relevant Lines: 51960

💛 - Coveralls

@BrannonKing
Copy link

I just want to note that the InvalidateBlock/ReconsiderBlock in lbcd and and bchd is incorrect. See gcash/bchd#512

@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

Can be rebased now!

@kcalvinalvin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I just want to note that the InvalidateBlock/ReconsiderBlock in lbcd and and bchd is incorrect. See gcash/bchd#512

This is a completely independent implementation by me. I didn't even know they were implemented there.

@Roasbeef Roasbeef changed the title blcokchain: Add ReconsiderBlock() blockchain: Add ReconsiderBlock() May 23, 2024

// Update the view to unspend all of the spent txos and remove
// the utxos created by the block.
err = view.disconnectTransactions(b.db, block,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style nit, can reflow as:

err = view.disconnectTransactions(
    b.db, block, detachSpentTxOuts[i],
)


// Nothing to do if the given block is already valid.
if node.status.KnownValid() {
return nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a log statament here? Something along the lines of:

log.Infof("block_hash=%x is valid, nothing to reconsider", hash[:])

b.chainLock.Lock()
defer b.chainLock.Unlock()

node := b.index.LookupNode(hash)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Naming suggestion: reconsiderNode.

// being reconsidered.
for n := tip; n != nil && n != node; n = n.parent {
b.index.UnsetStatusFlags(n, statusInvalidAncestor)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't we break after this?

Also isn't it possible that the block we want to reconsider is a descendent of several of the inactive chain tips? If this is the case, then we'll continually re-assign reconsiderTip for each of them.

Consider a scenario where we had 3 inactive chain tips {A, B, C}, block D that we want to reconsider is a descendent of all 3 chain tips, but they later on fork further down the line produce distinct chain tips (that we thought were invalid in the past).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually on second thought, block hash chains are unique, so if D is a descendent of all 3 chain tips, then the chain tips should themselves be identical.

// If we errored out during the verification of the reorg branch,
// it's ok to return nil as we reconsidered the block and determined
// that it's invalid.
return nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should log the error here.

func (b *BlockChain) ReconsiderBlock(hash *chainhash.Hash) error {
b.chainLock.Lock()
defer b.chainLock.Unlock()

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log.Infof("Reconsidering block_hash=%x", hash[:])

// Grab all the tips.
tips := b.index.InactiveTips(b.bestChain)
tips = append(tips, b.bestChain.Tip())

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log.Debugf("Examining %v inactive chain tips for reconsideration")


// Compare the cumulative work for the branch being reconsidered.
if reconsiderTip.workSum.Cmp(b.bestChain.Tip().workSum) <= 0 {
return nil
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log.Debugf("Tip to reconsider has less cumulative work than current chain tip: %v vs %v", reconsiderTip.worksum, bestChain.Tip().workSum)

// to it after checking the validity of the nodes.
detachNodes, attachNodes := b.getReorganizeNodes(reconsiderTip)

// We're checking if the reorganization that'll happen is actually valid.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log.Infof("Re-org to reconsider_block=%x size %v (num_add=%v, num_detach=%v)", reconsiderTip.hash[;], len(detchNodes)+len(attachNodes), len(detchNodes), len(attachNodes))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants