MNT: rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I've started rerendering the recipe as instructed in #119.

If I find any needed changes to the recipe, I'll push them to this PR shortly. Thank you for waiting!

Here's a checklist to do before merging.

• Bump the build number if needed.

Fixes #119

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[h-vetinari]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[beckermr]

@conda-forge-admin rerender

trying again since this used the old conda-build even though the docker image was rebuilt...

[h-vetinari]

since this used the old conda-build

The new builds are only just now starting to make their way through the CDN. Windows builds just became visible, linux-64 should be in 10-15min.

[h-vetinari]

@beckermr, do you need to verify something specific with the CI run here? I'd like to cancel it as it's pointlessly wasting resources.

[beckermr]

I am checking timing with the new conda build. Feel free to cancel.

[beckermr]

yeah CDN delay here was ~1 hour from when the build hit anaconda.org to when it was in the repodata. That is a lot slower than usual.

cc @conda-forge/core

[beckermr]

@conda-forge-admin rerender

[beckermr]

7 minutes - not bad! 2x faster!

[h-vetinari]

yeah CDN delay here was ~1 hour from when the build hit anaconda.org to when it was in the repodata. That is a lot slower than usual.

Nah, 2-3h is standard these days (especially across all architectures; individual arches are available sooner depending where in the cyclic(?) schedule of subdir-updates we land), and can be up to 5h if a file clone fails and needs to be retried, see conda/infrastructure#892

[h-vetinari]

7 minutes - not bad! 2x faster!

Awesome work @mbargull @kenodegard et al.! 💪 🙏

[beckermr]

Oh really? It was like 10 minutes just a few years back. What happened?!

[beckermr]

Ugh that's not a fun read.

[jakirkham]

If you have ideas on additional statistics that we can share, please feel free to add them here: conda/infrastructure#935 (comment)