Added WorkingDirectory property for #7471

[egvijayanand]

Problem

#7471

Solution

Added a property that returns the current directory (have named it WorkingDirectory) from where the dotnet command is invoked.

Checks:

• Added unit tests

[baronfel]

Thank you! This is a great start, there are a few things that need to happen to get this green:

• the error from the CI systems is complaining about a missing signature in the PublicAPI files - this can be done via an analyzer in VS/VSCode
• Can you update the docs around the host-provided values here as well?

[egvijayanand]

@baronfel I will check those feedback.

[egvijayanand]

@baronfel Have updated the advised details, can you review again and let me if anything more is to be done.

[baronfel]

This looks pretty good to me! There aren't tests for the existing built-ins, so as soon as you can fix the build error around the API surface area this should be good to merge :)

[egvijayanand]

This looks pretty good to me! There aren't tests for the existing built-ins, so as soon as you can fix the build error around the API surface area this should be good to merge :)

This is the error message:

src\Microsoft.TemplateEngine.Edge\PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt(11,1): error RS0025: (NETCORE_ENGINEERING_TELEMETRY=Build) The symbol 'Microsoft.TemplateEngine.Edge.DefaultTemplateEngineHost.WorkingDirectory.get -> string!' appears more than once in the public API files (https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn-analyzers/blob/main/src/PublicApiAnalyzers/PublicApiAnalyzers.Help.md)

Should I remove these API details from the Unshipped file?

[baronfel]

It looks like the same line is present multiple times - so just removing the duplicates should be all that you need to do.

[egvijayanand]

It looks like the same line is present multiple times - so just removing the duplicates should be all that you need to do.

It's not duplicated and only 11 items are present over there. That's why asking.

[egvijayanand]

After removing the entry from the Unshipped file, all checks have passed. Can you proceed with the merge?

[egvijayanand]

@baronfel can you look into this PR and let me know if anything else needs to be done?

[baronfel]

This LGTM - thanks for contributing.

@MiYanni / @joeloff - could one of you take a look from the engineering side?

[egvijayanand]

Hello @baronfel,

Can the PR be merged as the changes are approved?

[egvijayanand]

Thanks :-)