Fix bug with AWS not return KMS key for replica

[dobriSu]

Description

Fix for. Getting empty KMS key for DynamoDB replica bug.

Relations

Closes #37335

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_ PKG=dynamodb          
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go1.22.2 test ./internal/service/dynamodb/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_'  -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears
=== NAME  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
    table_replica_test.go:168: Step 1/4 error: Check failed: Check 3/3 error: aws_dynamodb_table_replica.test: Attribute 'kms_key_arn' expected "", got "arn:aws:kms:us-east-1:171364143024:key/79c1cb23-c797-47e9-8897-0d3f384d2403"
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears (207.75s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic (208.26s)
--- FAIL: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault (244.13s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr (244.61s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS (247.12s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass (302.84s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags (347.27s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys (450.21s)
FAIL
FAIL    github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/dynamodb   454.638s
FAIL
make: *** [testacc] Error 1

...

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[github-actions]

Welcome @dobriSu 👋

It looks like this is your first Pull Request submission to the Terraform AWS Provider! If you haven’t already done so please make sure you have checked out our CONTRIBUTOR guide and FAQ to make sure your contribution is adhering to best practice and has all the necessary elements in place for a successful approval.

Also take a look at our FAQ which details how we prioritize Pull Requests for inclusion.

Thanks again, and welcome to the community! 😃

[dobriSu]

Hi @YakDriver could you please take a look?
I am concerned that it might broke your PR:
#29102

[ewbankkit]

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_' PKG=dynamodb ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=2
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go1.22.2 test ./internal/service/dynamodb/... -v -count 1 -parallel 2  -run=TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass
=== RUN   TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys
=== PAUSE TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_basic (195.00s)
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrDefault (268.62s)
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_keys (355.45s)
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tableClass (501.58s)
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_tags (244.28s)
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitr (227.69s)
=== CONT  TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_pitrKMS (255.47s)
--- PASS: TestAccDynamoDBTableReplica_disappears (229.74s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/dynamodb	1158.480s

[ewbankkit]

@dobriSu Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v5.51.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!