Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update rust crate pretty_assertions to v1 #12

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 18, 2021

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
pretty_assertions dev-dependencies major 0.6.1 -> 1.0.0

Release Notes

rust-pretty-assertions/rust-pretty-assertions (pretty_assertions)

v1.4.0

Compare Source

Changed

  • (Windows only) Removed the ctor and output_vt100 dependencies, as their benefit could not be demonstrated (#​118)

Fixed

  • Minor documentation fixes (#​107)

v1.3.0

Compare Source

Changed

  • MSRV bumped to 1.54.0 (see #​102)
  • Removed the publically re-exported ansi_term::Style. This was never intended for public use. (see #​102)

Fixed

  • Moved from the unmaintained ansi_term crate to yansi for ANSI terminal escape code support. Thanks to @​Roguelazer for reporting and fixing this! (#​102, @​Roguelazer)

v1.2.1

Compare Source

Fixed

v1.2.0

Compare Source

Changed

v1.1.0

Compare Source

Added

  • Add assert_str_eq for comparing two str-like values without Debug formatting. Thanks to @​x3ro for implementing this! (#​88, @​x3ro)

Fixed

v1.0.0

Compare Source

Removed

  • assert_ne no longer warns if values match using PartialEq but not with Debug. This was noted as no longer being necessary after Rust 1.25 (current MSRV 1.35.0)

Added

  • Officially support no_std (thanks to @​Luro02 for the report and reviews!). Adds the std and alloc features to the pretty_assertions crate, with std enabled by default (#​83, @​tommilligan)
  • Adds the unstable feature to the pretty_assertions crate, for use with nightly rustc (#​81, @​tommilligan)
  • Add a drop in replacement for the unstable stdlib assert_matches macro, behind the unstable flag - thanks @​gilescope for the suggestion! (#​81, @​tommilligan)

v0.7.2

Compare Source

v0.7.1

Compare Source

v0.7.0

Compare Source

Changed

  • Move from difference to diff for calculating diffs. The exact assertion messages generated may differ from previous versions. (#​52, @​tommilligan)

For example, the following assertion message from v0.7.0:

pretty assertion

Was previously rendered like this in v0.6.1:

pretty assertion

Added

Fixed

Internal


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from 9bf8a9e to b8b7744 Compare March 7, 2022 13:52
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from b8b7744 to 2834c9e Compare March 26, 2022 14:31
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from 2834c9e to 8852078 Compare April 24, 2022 21:18
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from 8852078 to ff80b6c Compare September 25, 2022 22:01
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from ff80b6c to 688885e Compare November 20, 2022 16:43
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from 688885e to bf7971d Compare July 6, 2023 18:58
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pretty_assertions-1.x branch from bf7971d to 6d8817b Compare May 5, 2024 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants