added support for links to issues and tms for codeceptjs

[guiyomh]

Context

I want use allure xray plugin, but I must configure link on my test.
So, I propose this PR to set up the links to issue and tms.

Issue Link

Setup codeceptjs plugin with:

const { setHeadlessWhen, setCommonPlugins } = require("@codeceptjs/configure");
const path = require("path");

setCommonPlugins();

module.exports.config = {
  tests: "./**/*.test.js",
  output: path.resolve(__dirname, "./output"),
  plugins: {
    allure: {
      enabled: true,
      require: "allure-codeceptjs",
+      issueURlTemplate: "https://example.qameta.io/allure-framework/allure-js/issues/%s",
    },
  },
};

Feature("login-feature");
Scenario("login-scenario1", async () => {
  // your test
}).tag("@allure.issue:MY-ISSUE-82");

TMS Link

Setup codeceptjs plugin with:

const { setHeadlessWhen, setCommonPlugins } = require("@codeceptjs/configure");
const path = require("path");

setCommonPlugins();

module.exports.config = {
  tests: "./**/*.test.js",
  output: path.resolve(__dirname, "./output"),
  plugins: {
    allure: {
      enabled: true,
      require: "allure-codeceptjs",
+      tmsURLTemplate: "https://example.qameta.io/allure-framework/allure-js/tests/%s",
    },
  },
};

Feature("login-feature");
Scenario("login-scenario1", async () => {
  // your test
}).tag("@allure.tms:MY-TEST-CASE-64");

Checklist

• Sign Allure CLA
• Provide unit tests

[guiyomh]

@vovsemenv is this feature right for you?

[vovsemenv]

Hello @guiyomh! Looking good, but I have thoughts that this feature needs to be handled by the report-generator side of allure. I will add more detailed review later

[guiyomh]

You mean make a java plugin that does this job?

[vovsemenv]

yep

[guiyomh]

I think it's a good idea, but I don't know the plugin system very well.
I didn't see how to manage the priority between plugins. For example if I convert this feature to an allure2 plugin. It should be executed before the xray plugin, otherwise it doesn't make sense.

@vovsemenv do you know where can I found documentation about this ?

[baev]

All good! Thanks for the contribution! 🚀

Maybe we should align the configuration with the other integrations? For example, in Allrue Codeception https://github.com/allure-framework/allure-codeception, we added support for different link types.

[baev]

@vovsemenv @guiyomh we'll add tags processing on the generator side for labels. Still, the links should be processed independently at the framework side because links require additional configuration (link patterns), and users may build an aggregated report from different tests, which my require different link patterns per test type.

[baev]

BTW for allure-cucumberjs we have the following config https://github.com/allure-framework/allure-js/tree/master/packages/allure-cucumberjs

We really need to try harder to align simular features between the frameworks 🤪

[guiyomh]

If you want, I can do other PR to align other framework on this MR.

[baev]

fixed via #968

[baev]

@guiyomh thanks anyway!