Remove Idemixgen from Fabric produced binaries

[Sayalikukkar]

Type of change

• Documentation update

Description

Removed Idemixgen from the documentation to reflect its removal from the set of Fabric produced binaries. Also created the seperate PR for idemix repo.

Additional details

Related issues

Closes #3575

[denyeart]

Thank you for the update.

There is also a link to this document in a table of contents that needs to be removed at the same time - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hyperledger/fabric/main/docs/source/ops_guide.rst

Also https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/blob/main/docs/source/idemix.rst mentions that Fabric provides this tool. I think we'd want to update that wording from "Fabric provides two possible Idemix issuers" to "There are two possible Idemix issuers". And make "idemix tool" a hyperlink over to https://github.com/IBM/idemix.

Finally, I think we'd want this doc content to appear at https://github.com/IBM/idemix where the tool now resides, before removing it from Fabric docs, do you want to submit the PR to https://github.com/IBM/idemix as well to complete the move?

[Sayalikukkar]

@denyeart , Sure, I'm interested in helping with that. I can make the necessary updates to the Fabric documentation as you've described and also submit a pull request to the IBM idemix repository to ensure the content is properly moved.

[denyeart]

Thank you, looks good to me now.
But let's wait for @ale-linux to merge IBM/idemix#41 to ensure we have the doc somewhere.

[Sayalikukkar]

Thank you for your feedback and guidance!

[denyeart]

Suggested change

	b) the `idemix <https://github.com/IBM/idemix>`_ tool for development environments.
	b) the `idemixgen <https://github.com/IBM/idemix/blob/main/tools/idemixgen/idemixgen.rst>`_ tool for development environments.

Ok, the idemixgen tool doc was merged into the idemix repository, so let's point directly to that now.

[denyeart]

Thank you for the quick responses, looks good now!

[denyeart]

Sorry, there is now a conflict in the doc, I think in the ops_guide table of contents. Could you resolve the conflict by rebasing locally and then re-push?

Also, it would be nice to squash the 3 commits into a single commit, see guidance at https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/github/github.html#updating-a-pull-request.

[denyeart]

Perfect, thank you!