Remove hardcoded values in estimate_fee test #1526
Conversation
starknet-rpc-test/estimate_fee.rs
Outdated
| let invoke_transaction_2 = | ||
| BroadcastedTransaction::Invoke(BroadcastedInvokeTransaction { nonce: FieldElement::ONE, ..tx }); | ||
|
|
||
| let simulations = rpc |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we execute it instead of doing the simulation? i think that would be a better test, wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@apoorvsadana Thank you for your comment. Could you please clarify how to check the actual fee after execution? Additionally, does "executing it" refer to calling JsonRpcClient.add_invoke_transaction? Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can fetch the receipt to get the actual_fee. Yes, you need to call add_invoke_transaction
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@apoorvsadana, Thank you for your help. do you know how long we should wait until MaybePendingTransactionReceipt gets the Receipt value?
In my local machine, waiting for 20 seconds works fine, estimate_fee equals actual_fee(0xf0).
However, in the rpc-tests, it fails. After I changed wait time to 200 seconds, it still failed.
In another case, after adding PendingReceipt to match arm, it fails in rpc-tests because PendingReceipt.actual_fee(0xdc) is slightly smaller than Receipt.actual_fee(0xf0).
It looks like there is no validate, the fee should be 0xd2(210), if validate is skipped, the fee should be 0xdc(220), with signature, the fee should be 0xf0(240).
…into 1368_fee_test
… fee with actual fee
|
blocked by #1573 We are going to wait a bit before rebasing and merging this one, okay? |
|
@apoorvsadana Could you help to review this PR? Thanks |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1526 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.71% 31.22% -9.49%
==========================================
Files 96 89 -7
Lines 11069 9190 -1879
Branches 11069 9190 -1879
==========================================
- Hits 4507 2870 -1637
+ Misses 6050 5855 -195
+ Partials 512 465 -47 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Pull Request type
Please add the labels corresponding to the type of changes your PR introduces:
What is the current behavior?
Resolves: #1368
What is the new behavior?
Replace hardcoded value in estimate_fee test with actual fee
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Other information