Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cache: clip ttl to hour..ttl..week #212

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hannesm
Copy link
Member

@hannesm hannesm commented Jan 31, 2020

this is likely controversial -- reasoning behind this is https://00f.net/2019/11/03/stop-using-low-dns-ttls/ and the observation that e.g. github.com has ridiciously low ttls for no good reason... this PR is mostly a reminder that the current behaviour is not optimal for most setups, and should be refined. an option could be to provide configuration arguments (though dns cache doesn't have configuration atm); or we decide to merge and use the increased lower ttl. i tried this at the reproducible builds summit in december 2019 in marrakesh and didn't hear any complaints -- i suspect nobody noticed...

@cfcs
Copy link
Contributor

cfcs commented Mar 29, 2020

I think it's controversial, it will make all users of the cache (e.g. the client?) useless for a lot of use-cases, for instance when taking part in a Consul network (where low TTL is desired) etc.

Seems to me that this should be something configurable in a resolver (and maybe also client?) rather than hardcoded.

@hannesm
Copy link
Member Author

hannesm commented Mar 29, 2020

I agree this should be somehow configurable, and in some scenarios it is a good idea, while it is not such a good idea in other scenarios. let's keep this PR open for now (it is as well not urgent to get the clip in - but otherwise we'll forget about it).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants